Peter M wrote: > I've been reviewing the contents of lib/treasures with an eye > on the spells given. They don't seem to jibe with > http://mids.student.utwente.nl/~dnh/crossfire_pantheon.html > > Where there some discussions that I missed on these topics? > If so, would someone please see that > http://mids.student.utwente.nl/~dnh/crossfire_pantheon.html > is updated with the new plan? > > If not, I'll make the two agree more or less exactly. If you want to commit changes please keep an eye on the balance between the gods. And yes, as I implemented the new gods I did diverge from the original pantheon a bit. There were two reasons: First, a few spells were missing or at least didn't look like being finished to me. I see that you have inserted them now Peter, thank you. Second, some gods just needed little changes for balance. Every god needs *both* advantages and disadvantages in similar severity, so that there isn't one "best cult". E.g. look at Lythander and Sorig in the pantheon: I see heaps of bonus and not one single penalty. However, I didn't change very much. No matter what way to go, I think it is most important that everyone knows what's going on. Anyone should be able to participate. So I took the ascii-file of god-description that I already had posted, made a nice-looking html-site out of it and here it is: < http://mids.student.utwente.nl/~avogl/gods_pantheon.htm >. (It's kinda silly to have two seperated pantheons kept updated, so maybe darth bob wants to take this site and use it as new crossfire-pantheon of his?) Andreas V.