> Ok. I didn't look really close at the exact details, but it seemed to > be some amount of duplication of 'is this within map bounds, is there a > flag buildable, etc'. Maybe the amount to be reduced isn't so great. > OTOH, perhaps a flag can be passed into the check function which also > has some indication what to find and what to return. Actually, I rewrote a lot of code yesterday :) So it's better right now, i think... Patch will be submitted after some more tweaking, but maybe not too soon, want to implement much stuff before :) > If that's the case, then it should also generate a LOG() message. Duly noted. > gcc at least will catch those and print a warning. But it's just > easier to me (and really in the style of the rest of the code) that the > constant comes second. Ok, i guess it's just a matter of style :) Nicolas 'Ryo' _______________________________________________ crossfire-devel mailing list crossfire-devel at lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/crossfire-devel