Browsing living.c, and trying to erase warnings during compilation under Windows, i have a question regarding those 2 functions: int check_exp_loss(object *op, int exp) int check_exp_adjust(object *op, int exp) Sometimes exp is given as an int64 (since experience) Like loss = check_exp_loss(tmp, MIN(loss_3l, loss_20p)); (line 1796) with loss_3l & loss_20p being sint64 So shouldn't be those function more like sint64(object*, sint64) ? Also in living.c, we have (line 1442) (*dragon_gain_func)(who, abil->stats.exp, (int)((1+abil->resist[abil->stats.exp])/5.)); except the function prototype expects int as 2nd parameter... Just my 2 cents Nicolas 'Ryo' _______________________________________________ crossfire-devel mailing list crossfire-devel at lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/crossfire-devel