No subject

maps, and I'm not suggesting otherwise.  But it is reasonable to assume 
that different DMs will want to build worlds with a different feel to them.
I might want to recreate Tolkien's world, or Greyhawk for example, and I
don't anticipate everyone else wanting to do the same.


>
     
     
     >
     
       But I am thinking of changing the way to do cities - I'm now leaning to giving
     
     >
     
      the city its own 50x50 tile, and updating the links in the adjoining world maps
     
     >
     
      to use this tile, and putting a note in the 'missing' tile that in fact this
     
     >
     
      tile is /scorn/city or the like.  This at least makes it a little easier to move
     
     >
     
      things around, and I think will also make it a bit easier to know how maps are
     
     >
     
      related to each other (eg, everything in /scorn would go back to /scorn/city,
     
     >
     
      and not /world/world_110_124 for example).
     
     >
     
     
     
This approach shares much of the value of what I was trying to suggest,
so I won't try to argue you out of it, but I do think you should consider
whether it is feasible to put every city on a mod 50 boundary.  

Cheers,
-kls
-- 
          //                               .--=,
 .....::://::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.. (o O &           
     
     kevin at ank.com
     
     
::::::::
     
     //:::://://://:/:://::||_//       / V  K   
     
      :::::://:::://:/:|//'/' // _,|'         r ,  'qk   
  :'''/____ // /  //  |_// // ||        .'~.  .~`, 
                                   kls   \_/-=\_/