[crossfire] Moving server towards a modularized system?

[Miguel Ghobangieno]

Try not to dismiss things solely because they disagree
with your opinion.
Modularizing the server would create a ton of
problems, breakage, and solve nothing and add even
less: it is busy work. If you must be busy be busy on
some new feature rather then scrapping the last 10
years of work (and that is what would happen if we
seriously went on the modularizing war path).

Things you can help add:
plots (with red).
drunkeness.
work on regional fiat currencies.
pilotable boats (new arch in addition to the exit
boats we have), horses, etc.
perl plugin?

--- Yann Chachkoff <yann.chachkoff at myrealbox.com>
wrote:

> Le Lundi 16 Janvier 2006 18:47, Miguel Ghobangieno a
> écrit :
> > That is what the hurd project thought at the
> begining,
> > the reality is diffrent.
> >
> The Hurd project thought a microkernel architecture
> was interesting for 
> reasons other than maintainability. It is also a
> stalling project for reasons 
> unrelated to the concept of modularization itself.
> 
> If you're to use examples to illustrate your
> thoughts, try to use one you 
> really know and have an in-depth understanding of.
> -- 
> Yann Chachkoff
> -----------------------
> Garden Dwarf's Best Friend
> -----------------------
> GPG Key    :
>
http://keyserver.veridis.com:11371/export?id=9080288987474372064
> Fingerprint: 6616 2E02 BAD2 4AEF C90A  F1EB 7E03
> AAB9 844D 25E0
> > _______________________________________________
> crossfire mailing list
> crossfire at metalforge.org
>
http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com