[crossfire] the marvels of miscommunication :)
Yann Chachkoff
yann.chachkoff at myrealbox.com
Tue Jan 24 13:55:43 CST 2006
> You shouldn't GFDL it if deb considers it non free.
>
I never considered using the GFDL, since it was meant to be used for text or documentation material, not artistic pictures. The "Debian sees it as non-free" point was never considered, since the GFDL obviously didn't fit well artwork.
> Stick with the GPL that crossfire uses.
>
At the risk of sounding repetitive, the GPL is *not* suited for "artistic" pictures ! It uses definitions that *cannot* be applied in a clear, unambiguous way to that kind of work. So no, I'll *never* use it for anything else than code (and other similar works).
Note that it doesn't mean that I want to create a special case that would make the picture not compatible with the GPL - quite the contrary, I think my proposal protects correctly the work done, while allowing free redistribution and compatibility with GPL-based softwares.
> I make alot of art for crossfire and I don't insist
> on a new license... you can do the same.
>
No. The GPL wouldn't correctly protect that work in most countries. Simply because you accepted such a situation doesn't make a clunky solution more efficient or appliable.
> Otherwise... why do we need a new welcome screen?
>
Because the current one is not very nice ? Because it depicts monsters whose design completely changed ? Because a change or two is often refreshing ?
Besides that, I posted the license proposal so that if a GPL-incompatibility had slipped in, others may spot it, allowing to solve the issue. The decision of not using the GNU-GPLv2 or the GFDL has already been taken, and there is no point of reopening that debate, especially when nothing but sentimental feelings can justify the rediscussion.
More information about the crossfire
mailing list