[crossfire] safe/common item stack/inventory iteration?

[Andreas Kirschbaum]

Mark Wedel wrote:
> Andreas Kirschbaum wrote:
> > [collect deleted objects and defer actual deletion]
>
> But to do that, yet another set of object pointers is needed (or
> perhaps use teh objectlink structure) - you can't use the
> next/above/below pointers, because if you mess with those, you now
> have a case where the pointers don't point to expected data, which is
> the entire problem we are running into.

Sorry, I implicitly meant a new linked list. We probably need just a
plain linked list but no double linked list. Therefore an objectlink
list probably is the way to go since this does not increase the object
size by adding a pointer which almost always is NULL.


Andreas