[crossfire] New arch dir for roads, paths, etc?

[Mark Wedel]

On 06/ 7/10 08:51 PM, Kevin Bulgrien wrote:
> Does anyone have a particular objection to a factoring out of road/path arches
> from the wall directory?  I find the association of walls with paths to be
> unhelpful if not actually bewildering.  Wall is the last place I look for
> roads.
>
> This involves moving dirtroad, paved, footpath, yellow.

  I see no issue having a 'road' type directory.

>
> It could also involve a move of footbridge and stonebridge from "construct".

  Makes sense - construct isn't a great name, but it is what is there - 
buildings might have been a better name.

>
> Bridge and drawbridge could move too, but as they are in the gwall set, so
> probably they are not that important to move.

  In some cases, it is a difficult question because stylistically, it may belong 
with gwall, but could also belong in other directories - I'm not sure the 
correct answer, other than to make sure pickmaps are used.

>
> "travel" or "path" seem like reasonable folder names, though suggestions wil
> be entertained.
>

  I'm not sure I like travel - that could be confusing with transport.  But path 
or road seems fine.