On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 08:49:51AM -0700, Tim Rightnour wrote: > > On 14-Dec-01 crossfire-cvs-admin at lists.sourceforge.net wrote: > > Basic code clean, using switch instead of repeated else if's > > Hashed some code which was nop (didn't seem to do anything) > > changed over to using ATNR_SLOW etc, instead of AT_SLOW. > > > > Has been tested, all those interested in attack.c please read through this > > code > > again and make sure everything is in order. Mail problems to > > njh at hawthorn.csse.monash.edu.au ! > > Now.. I semm to remember from the style guide that we weren't supposed to do > this to comments.. weren't we? And that & vs == modifies the intent of that > function IIRC. Ahh yes I forgot to mention that =o. Those are the functions njh believed were nop, or simply wrong. He used those comments to make sure people check before I change em to /*'s. (I believe they were used so Mark would notice ;). > I'm about to leave for work.. so I won't have time to really read it and > analize it.. but I hope someone else can. Understandable, sorry I should have mentioned this. dnh