[CF-Devel] New Skill System
Mark Wedel
mwedel at sonic.net
Mon Dec 2 22:51:32 CST 2002
Yann Chachkoff wrote:
>
(This is my own proposal for a renewed experience system. I don't pretend it
>
is the way to go - it is just a proposal. I announced this two weeks ago on
>
IRC, but since luckily my whole life isn't Crossfire-aimed, I was only able to
>
post it today)
Interesting ideas.
Moving exp from generalized categories to specialized skills fixes the
problems of some skills not having ways to advance yet still having abilities
that should increase in level (say like mountaineering).
The ration of cost between generalized and specialized is really key. If
ratio is too low, or that category has enough subskills, it won't be worth it
for people to move the exp into speicialized areas.
One issue is how to deal with exp rewards. IF for example action X is
currently worth 1000 exp, under the new system, is that 1000 exp for the general
category (and thus 2000 exp in a specialized for example), or is that 500 exp
general, which gets converted to 1000 specialized?
Such a question is relevant, because it otherwise can become much easier to
gain levels and what.
I'm not sure I like the idea of using exp to learn new skills. First, I would
think you would need to allow the general exp to go negative for such purposes
(otherwise, if you have no skill in that exp category that gives you exp, you
could never learn one that does). But this just adds more issues to balance -
if cost is too low, cost then becomes pretty pointless. If cost is significant,
you'll probably find that some skills are just not worth learning (why would I
burn exp to learn something like sense curse/magic when I can use
spells/scrolls/wands/minor amounts of god for the same effect).
I'm also not sure how keen I'm on the idea of a maximum earned exp cap. The
idea you can only learn so much is somewhat disturbing on principal. But the
bigger issue is you might get players who have gotten say their wizardry to the
point they want it and want to improve physical. However, to play to the point
you don't want to cast any offensive spells because you don't want to limit what
you may get in physical would be a bit bizarre.
However, this perhaps bring up another question. If we're going to change all
this skill stuff, should we perhaps look at other changes?
For example, currently there is a max level of 110. However, spells for
example max out in terms of needing about level 30 to learn them all. Many
other skills and other bits may have upper limits of usefulness roughlyu in that
same range.
So the question might be - instead of level 110 being 2 billion exp, should we
make the max level 50 at 2 billion exp? Increase the exp table accordingly, so
it gets a lot harder to gain levels after 20 or something. This in itself may
forcce people to focus more, especially if we stretch out the spells so that
ther are level 35, 40, and so forth spells.
Max level has crept up over time to keep players happy who want to be able to
keep advancing their character. Cutting the max level lower would make things
tougher for higher levels - if your max level is 50, that cuts down on your
hp/sp/items you can use and whatnot.
More information about the crossfire
mailing list