Andreas Vogl writes: > in reply to gros: > > > I understand CVS is the right place for unstable/unfinished > > code, but don't you think it is a bit *too* unfinished ? Can't > > you at least try your code once before committing ? > > I agree of course that code has to be tested, but I also > think that the amount of work someone does should be taken > into consideration. > Does a bigger work excuse not testing it ? > What Mark did here was a real big thing, implemented both into > client and server. If something goes amiss in the process, it's > still a great piece of work on the whole. For me, a great piece of code is a code that works. Now I agree it can become quite difficult to find bugs (especially the pointer ones) when your code gets bigger. But those are not bugs that required intensive hunting/testing. Those are syntax errors, and a simple compilation try would have immediatly revealed them. So I stand on my point: reread and test your code at least once, to prevent such silly errors to happen in the future. Y. Chachkoff