[CF-Devel] Re: New races and spells.
Andreas Vogl
andi.vogl at gmx.net
Thu Nov 14 05:51:49 CST 2002
On 13-Nov-02 Todd Mitchell wrote:
>
> I think this is a good idea. If we got rid of the class/race
>
> face distinction and made a set of choosable arches for each
>
> race (with some overlap when body types are similar). Need a
>
> few more pictures here and there (some more elves, trolls,
>
> a halfling in full battle armour...maybe even a couple
>
> different dragon types, but they would be useful to reuse
>
> for npc's as well. It would be easier to have players pick
>
> from one big larger set, but I wouldn't want to see fireborn
>
> picking a halfling face, or a dwarf looking like a troll...
>
>
Personally.. I'm all for letting players choose whatever
>
crazy picture they want.. within some amount of reason.
This is mostly a matter of available art. The current system
was chosen simply out of practical reasons: Player animations
for classes exist only in humanoid shape. Due to the
lack of non-humanoid class faces, such races must stick
with their default race face.
Extending the system would be nice - But it doesn't make
a lot of sense while there is no art to support that.
For a player animation you need faces in all four
directions. You cannot just copy monster images because
they don't support those directional facings.
Of course one could argue: Let's just make the change,
then people will automatically draw the art to support it.
I don't have a problem with that philosophy, but past
experience has shown that it doesn't work.
I'd rather try to collect art before doing the
change - then people might be better motivated to draw
something, as they are eager to get the new feature.
Andreas
--
+++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more
http://www.gmx.net
+++
NEU: Mit GMX ins Internet. Rund um die Uhr für 1 ct/ Min. surfen!
More information about the crossfire
mailing list