Andreas Vogl wrote: > Mark W. wrote: > > Seriously, I thought these numbers were much higher. > I heard people complain that a populated CF server would eat up > more then 256 MB RAM at times... > But it sounds like your numbers are true (from Metalforge), > so I believe you. I remember that we had some serious memory-leaks > at times, maybe that got me thinking the mem-consumtion is so high. Yeah - I think there was some pretty horendous memory leaks - it looks like most of those have been fixed up. I'd have to watch metalforge for a longer period of time to see how much more memory it takes up. Size of object structure can have some effect on memory leaks if the leak itself is leaking the object structure, or something that contains the object structure. > That's very nice, but I don't want to make you feel like it is > your "duty" to work on this now. Please do it only when you > want to do it. I can live without it too. should be pretty easy to do. At the same time, I'll update the docs about how to add flag values, since I think that info doesn't currently exist. Adding new values isn't very difficult. I think at one time a perception that is was very difficult got started - not as much because it was, but because it isn't documented, and forgetting to do one step out of the several needed can result in it still not working, which can make it very frustrating for the person adding the value.