> > > ...You know the more I think about it (and I didn't plan on writing this > till just now...), a maplore arch with only a name and a lore field wouldn't > be that bad, it wouldn't require any changes to server or editor at all (add > a lore field to a marker perhaps?--what the heck is the marker for anyway) > would work in both map editors by default, and they would show up in the map > editor as a big bright letter L icons just waiting to be clicked on by map > makers much like the creators or no_magic arches or other system arches > do... It would automatically add lore to the maps in a usable format and > use the same collection routines as the arch lore, and It wouldn't be any > more of a hassle than managing a handful of connectors really... > > arch > Object > face maplore.111 > name > lore > endlore > invisible 1 > no_pick 1 > end > > > Jeez, the marker arch was the wrong arch to pick as an example wasn't it? Ok, how hard would it be to make a attribute page for an invisible arch with a name field, and a lore tab for the java editor (yes I forgot you'd still have to add the lore field to most of the attribute forms in the java editor Andreas, hopefully that is pretty simple - same as mesg field right?). I think this will work pretty good, it's still easier than any other way I can think of since all the mechanisms are there to make it work already (except for a pretty attribute page to fill in the lore in the java editor, but you can still enter it ). I'll even include a screen shot. Every thing else can be managed inside the lore field anyway. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Screenshot-3.png Type: image/png Size: 56596 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://shadowknight.real-time.com/pipermail/crossfire/attachments/20030430/7e2e354d/Screenshot-3.png