Tim Rightnour wrote: > That most decidedly, does not suck. The edges seem > a little sharp, but its the best dragon I've seen yet > for crossfire. Thanks. I'm happy that you like it so much. :-) > I'd be curious what it looks like in different colors.. > perhaps we can finally have a color set of dragons in > crossfire, like nethack and D&D. [...] Yes, we can convert it to different colors, but I would advise no to over-use the image. The red dragon alone is quite a popular monster which appears in many places. While I understand the fascination of dragon-sets, we should also consider that Crossfire already has a quite unique line of dragons: Fire (= red), cold (=chinese), elec (= blue), wyverns, chaos wyverns, ancient dragons etc. Admittedly, our dragon line might not be perfectly intuitive or complete, but I still like it somehow. I think it would be cool to add arches and images for anchient dragons. Ancient dragons became a well-known part of the CF world, so they really deserve to have an arch IMO. Especially because they fit very well in our system: The normal dragons are often too weak for players in the high-end ranges. So, I've tried to modify the red dragon slightly and create an ancient dragon. It still looks very much alike, but the ancient version has a darker red and more claws. I've updated the page: http://mids.student.utwente.nl/~avogl/crossfire/red_dragon/ > Would it scale down well for a baby? I've tried it. The size is a problem because the 96x64 doesn't fit well into 64x32. Apart from that, the dragon looks quite adultish. AndreasV -- +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage! _______________________________________________ crossfire-devel mailing list crossfire-devel at lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/crossfire-devel