Well, the contributions I started about a year and a half ago and later abandoned are now ripe for submitting. I'm not (yet) asking for cvs access; I understand I must contribute some first, till I have a "history". However, last time I tried I follow instructions I found somewhere of sending patches to SF. That didn't quite work :-) one of my two fixes is sitting there to this day (not sure if the bug was independently fixed, I believe not) and my improvement patch seems to never having been seen. Now the CVS page says to send patches to Mark or the list. Would that be a preferred protocol? Also - was it Mark the guy who prefers context diffs? []s, |alo +---- -- Those who trade freedom for security lose both and deserve neither. -- http://www.laranja.org/ mailto: lalo at laranja.org pgp key: http://garfield.laranja.org/~lalo/gpgkey-signed.asc GNU: never give up freedom http://www.gnu.org/ _______________________________________________ crossfire-devel mailing list crossfire-devel at lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/crossfire-devel