Lalo Martins wrote: > Well, the contributions I started about a year and a half ago > and later abandoned are now ripe for submitting. > > I'm not (yet) asking for cvs access; I understand I must > contribute some first, till I have a "history". > > However, last time I tried I follow instructions I found > somewhere of sending patches to SF. That didn't quite work :-) > one of my two fixes is sitting there to this day (not sure if > the bug was independently fixed, I believe not) and my > improvement patch seems to never having been seen. > > Now the CVS page says to send patches to Mark or the list. > Would that be a preferred protocol? > > Also - was it Mark the guy who prefers context diffs? The preferred method now is to upload the patches to sourceforge. I've been falling quite a bit behind on reviewing them and applying them as necessary - maybe with the onset of fall, I'll get more on top of things. Ideally, other people could also review the patches that are submitted by sourceforge, and apply if they look good. _______________________________________________ crossfire-devel mailing list crossfire-devel at lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/crossfire-devel