Nicolas Weeger wrote: > Hello. > > There are *many* places in the code where char* are used as arguments, > when const char* would be really all right. > > So I'd like to clean that, to use const char* everywhere this is > appropriate. > > This means many changes in functions in many files. I don't think that > would break things. Of course some functions legitimately can use char > when needed (to return arguments and so on). > > In the same topic, some function, many descriptive functions (for items, > monsters, and such) use a static char buffer, and return char*. This too > imo should be const char*, as you don't control the buffer and shouldn't > change it - but that's my opinion. > > Any objection to the first pass cleaning (argument)? fine by me.