Lalo Martins wrote: > And so says Kevin Rudat on 21/08/05 14:26... > >> On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 09:53:43PM -0700, Mark Wedel wrote: >> >>> On the one hand, crossedit is basically obsoleted, so I don't want to >>> spend a bunch of time and resources maintaining it. >>> >>> On the other, if people want to do so, who am I to say don't do it. >> >> I was thinking/hoping you'd say something like that. =) > > > Personally, I like crossedit better. May be my allergy to all things > java in general. If you want to maintain it, more power to you. If you > want to re-do it in gtk2, I might even step up to help. I wonder how much is also force of habit - took me a while (and some code changes) to get the java editor to the point I was willing to use it. That said, java is very portable, so easier for those non unix people to use it. I suppose a gtk client would be easier to make to a windows port. And while one side of me would sort of like the speed and efficiency of such an editor, one side of me says I really don't want to see another such editor due to the maintenance and support headaches it would involve (support for the deprecated crossedit is headache enough). That said, doing a gtk client probably wouldn't be really hard - layout could be done with glade, and the fact it would be C would mean it can basically re-use a lot of existing code (load/save code, display logic from client, etc). But that's really not a road I'd want to see resources spent.