[crossfire] multipart images

[Todd Mitchell]

Not sure I am following - I am proposing using "x" for single images
greater than a single tile in size.  Images that are a single tile would
still use the "1" as would the first tile in a large image which has not
been merged.  Since the first digit was only to denote the tile order
using x will distinguish multi-tile images from single tile images.


On Thu, 2005-26-05 at 22:19 -0700, Mark Wedel wrote:
>
     
      Todd Mitchell wrote:
     
     >
     
      > Changing the image names will have no impact on your maps, the arches
     
     >
     
      > will refrence the proper images if updated properly, it's just mostly a
     
     >
     
      > pain to remove and add the image files back into CVS.
     
     >
     
      > 
     
     >
     
      > It wouldn't be much of a standard if we didn't rename the images
     
     >
     
      > however...
     
     >
     
     
     >
     
        I have no issue with x being used.
     
     >
     
     
     >
     
        However, I'd also have to consider 1 being a proper first digit also 
     
     >
     
      (house.111, house.112), as it is only the first part.
     
     >
     
     
     >
     
        I had used x way back when just to hold the combined large images back before 
     
     >
     
      merged images were supported (back then, the merged images were just used 
     
     >
     
      because it was easier to make the image as a single piece than split it into 
     
     >
     
      small pieces).
     
     >
     
     
     >
     
     
     >
     
      _______________________________________________
     
     >
     
      crossfire mailing list
     
     >
     
     
      crossfire at metalforge.org
      
      
     >
     
     
      http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
      
      
     -- 
Todd Mitchell <
     
     temitchell at sympatico.ca
     
     >