[crossfire] crossfire source code control systems

[Mark Wedel]

  Any selection method is flawed at some level.

  Voting probably does make the most sense - but even then, you get some 
complications - should the amount of commits a person do also have weight on the 
number of votes?

  A person who does 5 commits a week is using the system a lot more than the 
person that does 1 commit a month.  Do we attempt to weigh that at all?  And if 
so, how?

  (its probably worth noting that different people work on different things, 
which probably also weighs on what they want to use.  Rename feature is going to 
be much more important for maps and archetypes than for the code area, where 
files are seldom renamed)

  Is the voting method just vote for what you want to use?  Or does each person 
provide a list, and you weigh the bottom vote getters with some negative points? 
(for example, if lots of people put the same thing as their bottom choice, that 
suggest some strong dislike).

  And how long should the voting process be for?  Need some finite time - 
probably a week or so.

  Should we vote on the voting method? :)