[crossfire] Arch repository: layered art files?
Nicolas Weeger
nicolas.weeger at laposte.net
Wed Dec 12 16:56:42 CST 2007
> > Does anyone else think that putting the source files into SVN is a good
> > idea, or just extra clutter?
>
> Sounds like a good idea.
Agreed on that. Having all the sources is nice, and makes it easier to fix
things later on :)
> The Gimp's xcf is a good contender. However, it is also true that there are
> many artists who are using Photoshop, Painter, or Open Canvas; so I'd
> suggest not defining any specific file format, and let each artist use
> whatever he prefers.
Agreed, many formats can be used. Of course open formats should be encouraged
when possible :)
> Maybe it would be nice to put those elsewhere than in the arch subdir, so
> that artists who wouldn't require the rest can only download those, and
> non-artists can grab the arches without the (possibly heavy) graphic
> "source" files that would be of no use for them ?
Agreed on that too, maybe put in a arch_src tree duplicating the arch
structure?
Nicolas
--
http://nicolas.weeger.org [Petit site d'images, de textes, de code, bref de
l'aléatoire !]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mailman.metalforge.org/pipermail/crossfire/attachments/20071212/fe5bcf91/attachment.pgp
More information about the crossfire
mailing list