[crossfire] C++/Qt server version

[Nicolas Weeger]

> I see two good reasons for Nicolas favouring Qt over Boost:
>
> - He's more familiar with Qt, and having to learn another toolkit,
> especially something as complex as Boost, would be somewhat of a waste of
> time;

This is true, but I'm hopefully not the only one writing the server code :)
Therefore others' point of view should be taken into account.
Of course, if people choose for instance COBOL for the server, I still reserve 
the right to work on a version that suits be better ^_-

> - Although you mentioned several things that integrate nicely with Boost,
> providing Internationalization or a crossplatform building system, the
> whole point is that all of this is provided inside the Qt tool suite, and
> requires no external/3rd party dependency. This is a significant advantage
> to me.

Yes, that's a point I like too, and this is also why I mentioned Qt in the 
first mail, because you can avoid some evil dependency-related issues 
(Windows is bad for that, for instance :))


Nicolas
-- 
http://nicolas.weeger.org [Petit site d'images, de textes, de code, bref de 
l'aléatoire !]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mailman.metalforge.org/pipermail/crossfire/attachments/20081126/02914223/attachment.pgp