[crossfire] Conventions for exits in town

[Nicolas Weeger]

>   I think as much as anything else, the meaning of the exit (based on
> appearance) should be consistent.

Yes, indeed.

>   For example, stairs no matter where they are, should require an explicit
> apply to use them
>
>   Oak doors could always be auto apply, etc.  Buildings are always explicit
> apply, and so on.

I'd say explicit apply for all things you'd expect to use/apply in real life: 
doors, stairs, ladders, boats, ...
On the other hands, things like teleporters, shop mats, whirlwind exits aren't 
expected to need to be applied, IMO.


>   So as a player, if I see an oakdoor, I know what it will (or won't do) no
> matter where I am.
>
>   Beyond that, having more consistency based on location sounds good.  It
> may just mean updating all the maps to have the appropriate exit for their
> location.

Yes, some massive update :)


Nicolas
-- 
http://nicolas.weeger.org [Mon p'tit coin du web]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mailman.metalforge.org/pipermail/crossfire/attachments/20100114/4857ba6a/attachment.pgp