[CF-Devel] Hey, slow down a bit!
Mark Wedel
mwedel at scruz.net
Mon Apr 9 23:51:01 CDT 2001
Preston Crow wrote:
>
>
>PS-Whats the policy for including new mapsets right now or within
>
>the stable releases? Mine should prolly be usable some time soon...
>
>
While I have no real say in the matter, it seems that it should be a
>
no-brainer to include more mapsets in the main distribution. What should
>
be debated is when they're ready to be linked in to the standard maps.
>
>
For example, if I were to include my maps (which aren't ready by any
>
means), I would include:
>
>
/preston/README
>
A description of the maps, explanation that they're not linked in, and
>
instructions on how to link them in.
>
/preston/patch
>
A patch file that will update one of the main maps to link my maps in,
>
as explained in the README.
>
>
I sure wish the Grey Shield maps were included in that fashion. (Actually,
>
I wish they were standard--they're better than a good number of the older
>
maps.) Does anyone know where they are now?
This is actually a reasonable idea. I would suggest that manual directions for
including/linking in the map may be needed.
If several people do this, it is possible that the patches included may
conflict with each other, which is why I suggest this.
Someone else is taking care of maps as I recall, although with CVS, that isn't
need as much. I would suggest that no new maps should probably be linked in to
active maps until after 1.0.
But there is a question of why include stuff that is not ready yet? The only
real reason I could see is if you hope other people will work/finish up the maps
(or if they're mostly ready - ie, need some debugging/balance issues).
More information about the crossfire
mailing list