Andreas Vogl wrote: > I think there is no doubt the Java Editor can and will replace > Crossedit. - However, don't set your expectations about the Java Editor > too high right now. It is still work-in-progress. The base structure > is completed and it's usable, but many features known from crossedit > will need to be coded into the new Editor before we can say that it > "officially outstripped crossedit". I notice that. But OTOH, it does seem to be pretty capable right now, ie, you could create a map. I would guess that probably the biggest shortfall is that it doesn't have the custom dialogue boxes for the different object types (ie, for an exit, crossedit pops up a window that asks for exit path and well as destination coordinates, so the designer doesn't need to know that those really go into the slaying and sp/hp fields. > In the long run I think the Java Editor has some big potential > advatages over Crossedit: > - Java can be run on any OS. That's pretty cool. > - Many people want to learn Java - Few people ever like to learn > about the Xt toolkit. Agree with both of those.