[CF List] race, profession, guild & titles (Getting tired)
Chachkoff Yann
yann.chachkoff at mailandnews.com
Sat Jul 21 11:39:19 CDT 2001
Le Vendredi 20 Juillet 2001 18:38, vous avez écrit :
>
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Chachkoff Yann wrote:
>
> It is a feature most players like to play with. It may just be a little
>
> useless toy, but since most people like it and because it does not
>
> require lots of resources, I suppose letting it would not harm. It also
>
> solves the debate : I want it / Remove it; so we can still have the
>
> nickname system for those that find it fun to use alongside with a
>
> complex title system used for guild entries, quests, etc.
>
>
Makes sense. Presumably, you will want to make it clear what is the
>
title the character has chosen, and what titles the character has earned.
>
So if you get the title of 'retriever of the kings crown' for some
>
quest, and a player decides to 'title' himself with that, it would
>
be clear what title is really his and what is effectively a
>
nickname.
>
>
> Of course, it is obvious. That's why I suggested a "title" command, so
>
> they are not displayed unless you really want to know what they are (much
>
> like the list of known spells).
>
>
Otherwise, other than cosmetic/fun, do multiple titles have any real
>
efect? I suppose you could have checkers check the characters title, but
>
presuming they got the title from some source, just as easy to add
>
an invisible object that contains the title as well as key for the
>
inventory checker.
That I do well understand. But there was a discussion here about adding
titles and using them in the game rules. Now you are saying that maybe it is
not an interesting stuff ? I'm quite puzzled by this.
>
>
All in all, this is probably not a hard thing to do, and probably no
>
big reason not to do it. OTOH, if this is a feature most people
>
don't care about or look at, there is then the question if it worth doing
>
at all.
*sigh*
Just only two points:
- Titles and nicknames are quite important (to a certain point of course) for
many players (Again, I've not seen the question "what players do think about
it" put a lot here) do like the title stuff and use it, and would be happy to
see it extended in a way or another. So it is certainly worth doing it.
- It may be easy to do, and there may be no good reason not to do it. Then
why no coder already made a model and published as a patch here so anyone can
test it ? Should I or Mich. Toennies go again alone to see it included one
day ? Where are all the coders gone ? I admit some discussion is a neccessity
to get a good consensus, but there must be a time to take the final decision
and go one step further ! If it takes two weeks for a thing as simple as the
player title, how long could it take to decide what to do with more important
things like new object structure or multiheaded server ?
I'm sorry if all this sounds quite "rude", but I and others are becoming
upset by seeing how things are getting in Crossfire - should we move to
another project maybe less advanced but with more good will to do productive
things ?
Chachkoff Y.
(I think I'll get *lots* of friends with this...)
More information about the crossfire
mailing list