> Peterm wrote: AV, your modified scheme seems fine to me, by and large, but your calculations don't include protection spells (protection from attack) armour spell (armour) (ironwood skin) potions (invulnerability, aetherality). Does consideration of these other ways to boost physical protection change your calculations? 3 of the 5 are readily available to fighters. After all, fighters must also often face fire and cold and other attacks, and these are much more dangerous, because they cannot be avoided by simply stepping back a square. So I think we can safely tolerate less protection to physical attacks than for the others. How about you pick values for 90, instead of 94? PeterM > > With enchant armour scrolls, it's not very hard to obtain > > armour values like 95 or 97. Permanently, and with items of > > your choice. > > > > We can do this immediately post 1.0. > > > > To get similar values for other resistances, you have to > > make REAL tradeoffs. > > > > How about this? Armour caps for every type of armour: > > > > Type Max armour Current max > > boots 10 90 > > helmet 20 90 > > armour 60 90 > > shield 20 90 > > gloves 10 90 > > gauntlets 10 90 > > cloak 20 90 > > bracers 10 90 > > max total: 86% 99% > > > I don't propose to cap the amout of ac given beyond what > > is already done. > > It's a real good idea, but I think the maxes you proposed > are too low. Almost every monster has physical attack, at > higher levels these do crazy amounts of damage. A warrior > needs real tight physical protection or he is totally screwed. > 86% is not enough. > > What about this?: > > Type Max armour > boots 20 > helmet 30 > armour 65 > shield 40 > gauntlets 30 /gloves 10 > cloak 20 > bracers 10 > > max total: 94% > > Note that the max total can be surpassed by finding equipment with > more than max armour. Wearing rings/amulets(/girdles?) with > physical protection is also possible but usually this will not > be rewarding. > > > Andreas V. > _______________________________________________ > crossfire-devel mailing list > crossfire-devel at lists.real-time.com > https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/crossfire-devel