On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 01:56:42PM -0700, Mark Wedel wrote: > On Wed, 23 May 2001, Chris Lusena wrote: > > I think that the major resistance is to those of us with lower > > graphics than 1024x728x 24 bit color, or is it 16 bit color? > > Realistically, the number of bits isn't really important. While the > graphics will look best with 16+ bit displays, it should still work on > 8 bit displays (it does some primitive color matching, which works, > but images won't look as good, just as what happens with any reduced > color mechanism) I've used the current color matching 1.0.0 and I can say that the color matching is _very_bad_ IMHO, in fact I find it so bad as to limit playablity. I've switch _back_ to xpm from png because the color matching is so bad, even though since I have sufficient resolution I prefer the bigger tiles. Though I am on a sun which I believe are know for bad X implementations and poor color control, so it could be something odd my system. -- Chris Lusena Office: 762 AH Department of Computer Science Phone: 859-257-3678 773 Anderson Hall Fax: 859-323-1971 University of Kentucky Email: lusena at cs.uky.edu Lexington, KY 40506-0046 U.S.A. http://www.cs.uky.edu/~lusena