On 23-Nov-01 David Hurst wrote: > Mmm, actually we don't take many images at all from other games. i can think > of > only a few, most are taken from artist sets, who specifically say 'these are > free to use by anyone as long as my name is put in the credits' type stuff. I have no problem with that. In fact, my problem with the proposed liscence is twofold: 1) "only for a game named crossfire". Sure, it's free to us, but thats not very open-source-friendly of us. My point there is that it's not nice to use other free images, and then put a sign on one of ours that says "you can't have this one" 2) Non-modification is a bit much. What constitutes modification. If I animate it, is that modifying it? What if I shrink it down or expand it? What if I want a green dragon? Is it worth having this picture, if we have to tippy toe around it? Do we want to have to deal with this kind of thing in the future, and accumulate more liscenses like this? --- Tim Rightnour < root at garbled.net > NetBSD: Free multi-architecture OS http://www.netbsd.org/ NetBSD supported hardware database: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/hw.cgi