[CF-Devel] RE: GTK editor
Yann Chachkoff
yann.chachkoff at MailAndNews.com
Fri Oct 26 04:05:24 CDT 2001
>
===== Original Message From <
andi.vogl at gmx.net
> =====
>
Chachkoff Y. wrote:
>
>>
A GTK editor is under development. Should reach beta-test stage
>>
in a couple of weeks.
>
>
Why are you developing a GTK editor?
Because quite some people asked for one.
>
Then we have two editors and the development effort is split
>
in half.
>
The idea behind the Java Editor was to have one editor for
>
everybody. With a GTK editor, the linux guys will maybe work
>
on the GTK and the windows guys on the Java Editor.
>
And just like with the clients, whenever there is a new feature
>
we have to update two map-editors instead of one.
>
>
And GTK runs only on linux/unix systems, does it?
Untrue. There are ports of GTK to Windows and they are quite complete and
up-to-date.
>
That means,
>
even if you create a super-fantastic GTK editor, you reach only
>
half of the user-base. And maybe there's even linux-systems without
>
GTK installed.
That is also true with Java, isn't it ?
>
Not to mention how unpredictable the future of a toolkit like GTK can be.
The GTK toolkit seems to be quite widespread today and should not disappear in
the next years.
>
>
I don't want to stop you developing this editor. And I'm certainly
>
not mad with you for doing it.
>
It just makes me a little bit sad to see how Crossfire developers
>
never cooperate on anything.
You don't understand the problem: It is not that I don't like the Java editor
(I already expressed on this), neither that I favour GTK/Linux over anything
else (personally I do prefer QT) - And for the question of the programming
language used, I definitely find Java cleaner and more portable than C.
But...
What some mapmakers already expressed is quite easy to understand: In its
current form, the Java editor is "too heavy" for their computers (either for
speed or resources consumptions). Attempts to improve this have given little
results so far. I admit that having just one java editor is indeed the best
way - But if people are still using the old crossedit just because they can't
run smoothly the Java editor, there is clearly a demand for such a tool. (I
could simply have said to them "buy a new computer", but they strangely found
that solution unsatifying).
If I was able to find a solution to make the Java Editor faster/smaller, I
would never have started this. But since it would have required the rewriting
of the Swing GUI toolkit, I was unable to do anything.
Chachkoff Y.
-----------------------------------------
Visit
http://www.chachkoff.f2s.com
for
a journey into a fantastic world !
(But don't expect too much...)
-----------------------------------------
More information about the crossfire
mailing list