[CF-Devel] Fork in CFJavaEditor?
Andreas Vogl
andi.vogl at gmx.net
Sun Jan 27 21:52:38 CST 2002
In reply to Bob Tanner:
>
That's dissappointing. Why'd you open source it in the first
>
place, if you don't want other to contribute to the code base?
>
[...]
>
What really is irritating is that you do not seem to "get" open
>
source development. In all the other project I code for there is
>
always a clash of ego. Then lots of discussion, compromises, and
>
finally a solution that acceptable to the developers and (usually)
>
very good for the community.
And I have heard opensource also means that people inform
the community before changing other people's work.
Maybe I didn't get it indeed...
>
Forking of the code can be good and bad. [...]
>
In crossfire's case 1 project will stagnate.
>
Bottom line AV, your fork hurts the -community-, IMHO.
I enjoy working in a community as long as I
feel treated in a fair way.
>
I've seen you do this 2 times now. If it's not your way, then
>
you storm off and fork the code and start a new project, instead
>
of trying to work with the community.
Your wrong, I didn't do that before.
I didn't meet anyone I couldn't get along with, before.
>
My intention with the editor was to make it easier to build,
>
package and deploy under linux. I never intended to take over
>
the development or design of the project.
>
[...]
>
I'd like to work with you to integrate your changes into the
>
main cvs repository and change whatever you want to keep the
>
project together.
That's a very kind offer.
If I had the old package name, source in "/CFEditor" and the
former indenting style - I could easily merge my stuff in cvs
and abandon the forked version.
Andreas V.
PS.: By "former indenting style" I mean this:
if (expression) {
statement;
statement;
}
on cvs currently, most files contain this:
if (expression)
{
statement;
statement;
}
More information about the crossfire
mailing list