> Yes, that would be bad. > > Perhaps I wasn't clear. <snip> > Suppose down the road, I wand to do something like: > type 34 > subtype 3 > To say 'if object type is 34, and subtype is 3, make this an artifact'. <snip> > And I certainly see the potential need for subtype to act as a match > operator in the future. Ok, didn't think of subtype matching. Fair enough, i'll reimplement differently :) > IMO, that is preferable. I personally don't like the artifacts file > that much, so anything that can easily be done as an archetype instead > of an object is preferable in my mind. Ok, i'll remake my stuff using artifacts. Nicolas 'Ryo' _______________________________________________ crossfire-devel mailing list crossfire-devel at lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/crossfire-devel