--- Mark Wedel < mwedel at sonic.net > wrote: > I was never really happy with the north and south poles being at the > corners. IT just isn't that intuitive. I can understand the reason > (want the poles to be relative small areas). but I also wonder if the map > as given should be seen as covering the entire world, or just some part of > it (eg, one of the continents in the northern hemisphere, for example, > such that the equator is near the south edge of the map, and the north > pole would effectively be a few hundred spaces still farther to the north) Sounds good to me, as I said - > > On the other hand, it would be good to make a decision, document it, > > and stick to it, so that we are all on the same page. To keep things interesting, we should ensure that there is a portion of the map that is ice bound at least part of the year. And let people walk on the ice, at least until it melts... > Do I expect new continents to be added? Not really. However, when > putting down the towns/roads, I did put up signs which basically amounted > to 1 space = 1 mile (eg, scorn, 764 miles north or something). One could > obviously make the case that a crossfire mile isn't the same as a human > mile. At least call them something different to avoid confusion. http://mobile.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Mobile - Check & compose your email via SMS on your Telstra or Vodafone mobile. _______________________________________________ crossfire-devel mailing list crossfire-devel at lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/crossfire-devel