----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Wedel" > I'd personally probably prefer it to be something like grass_sm.base.111.png > or the like, and have these smoothed graphics in the same location as the > graphics they smooth (and not all dumped into one directory that is only > indirectly associated with the graphics they smooth). > When I added some of these smoothing sets, I took it on myself to change the name like: S_grass.base.111.png and removing the grasslike directory so that all the images are in one directory. I think this is more along the lines you mention. > it'd probably also be nice to be able to put the 'smooth' line in the arc or > face file vs using a file in the lib directory - same thing - locality of > information. Just have the collect script pull out the smooth lines as it > processes the arc's (As it does for animatinos now). > > This isn't that big an issue, but I'd think it make things easier to maintain. If you mean having a smooth field in the arch so archmakers can set the smoothing they want to apply to that new object (or if they make a new smoothing set for it), rather than having to update the server, then that does sound like a good idea. _______________________________________________ crossfire-devel mailing list crossfire-devel at lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/crossfire-devel