Todd Mitchell wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Wedel" > >> I'd personally probably prefer it to be something like > > grass_sm.base.111.png > >> or the like, and have these smoothed graphics in the same location as the >> graphics they smooth (and not all dumped into one directory that is only >> indirectly associated with the graphics they smooth). >> > > > When I added some of these smoothing sets, I took it on myself to change the > name like: S_grass.base.111.png and removing the grasslike directory so that > all the images are in one directory. I think this is more along the lines > you mention. yeah - I'd actually prefer grass_S.., simply so that they are together alphabetically. > If you mean having a smooth field in the arch so archmakers can set the > smoothing they want to apply to that new object (or if they make a new > smoothing set for it), rather than having to update the server, then that > does sound like a good idea. yep - that is the idea. _______________________________________________ crossfire-devel mailing list crossfire-devel at lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/crossfire-devel