On 01-Jun-03 Nicolas Weeger wrote: > Actually, what bothers (?) me is that the logic is different in the > server & the (GTK) client. I agree here. It's not the lack of a close command, because there are ways to close it. It's the fact that you would expect to cycle through open/close apply/unapply, and yet, it does not. This drives me up the wall when playing, as I have to stop, unapply the bag manually, and then do whatever. The cycle should be extended to include unapplied, as otherwise you have to go through contortions that are not intuitive to get the bag to stop picking things up. Also, while on the subject of bags.. an "empty" command would be nice. It would also be neat if you could lock items inside your bag. I would expect the behavior of the lock to be different, in that it would only affect things like the empty command. I spend far too much time at my apartment manually sorting crap out of the bags, one click at a time. --- Tim Rightnour < root at garbled.net > NetBSD: Free multi-architecture OS http://www.netbsd.org/ NetBSD supported hardware database: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/hw.cgi _______________________________________________ crossfire-devel mailing list crossfire-devel at lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/crossfire-devel