Tim Rightnour wrote: > > > > The electric, chinese, and bone drakes are very nice images, > > > even though they strike me as being in the wrong perspective. > > > > [...] I use the alternate set images, and they are in a > > perfectly fine perspective in that context [...] > > Well, exactly, for the base set, they are dead wrong. Now I'm confused. Which dragons in which image set are wrong in which context? :-) I believe the base chinese and base elec dragon are in correct perspective for the base set. Maybe not perfectly correct but roughly. The bone drake however is flat which makes it fine for alternate set and definitly wrong for base set. > Well.. let me then make a blind proposal on dragons, and lets > see what people think. This is just off the top of my head, and > is no way a set in stone list. > Lets corraborate on this and tweak it. > > First, lets start with the colors: > [...] I fully agree with Mark's description on how to fill up gaps in the CF monster families. The idea of generally overhauling dragons goes a little bit too far IMO. By fundamentally changing the abilities of all dragons, their difficulty and behaviour will change. This again will cause an immense number of maps to change in a quite unpredictable kind of way. The idea of adding a possibly large bunch of new monsters with copied, resized or otherwise mediocre graphics also makes me feel, frankly, a bit uncomfortable. AndreasV -- +++ GMX - Mail, Messaging & more http://www.gmx.net +++ Bitte lächeln! Fotogalerie online mit GMX ohne eigene Homepage! _______________________________________________ crossfire-devel mailing list crossfire-devel at lists.real-time.com https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/crossfire-devel