[crossfire] Moving server towards a modularized system?

[Miguel Ghobangieno]

Indeed. Just because the server can be modularized
thus blocking any other new development whilst that
takes place doesn't mean it's a good idea. I for one
frown on the idea of making the server slower and
blocking other development.

--- Yann Chachkoff <yann.chachkoff at myrealbox.com>
wrote:

> > If this range of languages is increased, there is
> a danger that it would include languages outside the
> range of competence of the existing developers, or
> outside the range of languages which are well
> supported on some of crossfire's target platforms.
> >
> That is true - I'm not myself in favor of a system
> in which several languages would get used.
> Introducing something else than C in the server code
> would definitely create a lot of issues, and isn't
> something I'd like to see without a prior
> discussion.
> 
> Probably the best rules is: code in C, and if you
> *really* think another language is needed, then ask
> the mailing list first, so the case gets discussed.
> Just because it can technically be done doesn't mean
> it is a good idea.
> _______________________________________________
> crossfire mailing list
> crossfire at metalforge.org
>
http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> crossfire mailing list
> crossfire at metalforge.org
>
http://mailman.metalforge.org/mailman/listinfo/crossfire
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com