Mark Wedel wrote: > I don't know if the editor or any other functions may have similar assumptions > about the autojoining walls or not. If so, either those need to be fixed or > perhaps we should rename rough_wall to be roughwall instead (I don't know how > many maps may be using the first form that would require updating) I take that part back - it appers that both rough_wall and roughwall exist, and are the same objects except for the name. We should really settle on one of get rid of the other. According the the map_info script, the non underscore one (roughwall) is not currently being used in any official maps.