> Mark Wedel wrote: > I take that part back - it appers that both rough_wall and roughwall exist, > and > are the same objects except for the name. We should really settle on one of > get > rid of the other. According the the map_info script, the non underscore one > (roughwall) is not currently being used in any official maps. I'd like to keep the "roughwall" version, please, on the grounds that it simplifies my random map autojoining code considerably. Having both makes it unnecessary to fix all the existing maps. PeterM