[CF-Devel] smoothing screenshots

[crossfire-devel-admin at archives.real-time.com]

>>
     
      if the default behaviour of arches without a smoothing level
     
     >>
     
      should be to float to the top instead of getting covered by objects with
     
     >>
     
      smoothing levels.  Say something has not smoothing level maybe it should
     
     >
     
      >get set to 255 by default.
     
     
>
     
     This lead to a problem concerning the smoothlevel 0. Should things at
     
     >
     
     smoothlevel 0 being set to level 0 only to say they can be overlapped?
     
     Should
>
     
     i use your idea but instaed of using level 255 use level 0? If it is we
     
     >
     
     report the problem to smoothlevel 1 which couldn't spread over smoothlevel
     
     0
>
     
     due to exception law and could over other smoothlevel since it's not higher
     
     >
     
     than them.
     
     
0 or 255 doesn't matter to me, just if the default behaviour is that if
there is no smoothlevel value it is on top.

>
     
     However idea to check, i'll try to see wht it give. This will mean loosing
     
     1
>
     
     smoothlevel, but only one is not important. This could solve the sea
     
     problem
>
     
     too.
     
     
It would solve the problem with one off arches getting covered anyway,
perhaps someone makes a special kind of swamp or tree or road or something,
they wouldn't need to worry about smoothlevels.  Meanwhile all the commoinly
used arches still have proper order assigned.

BTW - I think things are starting to look very nice with the smoothing,
still a lot of tweeking yet to go, but I spent some time just looking around
and liked how it's turning out.  The marshes are particularily nice looking.


_______________________________________________
crossfire-devel mailing list
     
     crossfire-devel at lists.real-time.com
     
     
     https://mailman.real-time.com/mailman/listinfo/crossfire-devel